<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 721 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358610</link>
    <description>Coconut oil packed in small retail containers raised a tariff classification dispute between Heading 1513, covering coconut oil, and Heading 3305, covering preparations for use on the hair. One view treated retail packing, market understanding, and suitability for hair use as sufficient to bring the product within Heading 3305, relying on the chapter and section notes and HSN-based interpretation. The contrary view held that pure coconut oil remains classifiable under Heading 1513 unless it is shown to be a hair preparation, and that packing size alone does not change its tariff position. The Bench differed, and no majority determination on classification was reached.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 15:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 721 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358610</link>
      <description>Coconut oil packed in small retail containers raised a tariff classification dispute between Heading 1513, covering coconut oil, and Heading 3305, covering preparations for use on the hair. One view treated retail packing, market understanding, and suitability for hair use as sufficient to bring the product within Heading 3305, relying on the chapter and section notes and HSN-based interpretation. The contrary view held that pure coconut oil remains classifiable under Heading 1513 unless it is shown to be a hair preparation, and that packing size alone does not change its tariff position. The Bench differed, and no majority determination on classification was reached.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>