<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1162 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200705</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and remanded the issue of Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) computation to the Assessing Officer/Transfer Pricing Officer for reconsideration, allowing both parties an opportunity to present their arguments. The appeal by the Revenue was partly allowed for statistical purposes, while the cross objections by the assessee were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 06:07:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1162 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200705</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and remanded the issue of Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) computation to the Assessing Officer/Transfer Pricing Officer for reconsideration, allowing both parties an opportunity to present their arguments. The appeal by the Revenue was partly allowed for statistical purposes, while the cross objections by the assessee were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>