<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 696 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358585</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the CIT&#039;s invocation of Section 263 was not justified as it did not cause prejudice to the Revenue. The matter was restored to the CIT(A) for reconsideration of the proviso to Section 2(15) and the exemption under Section 11. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2018 07:17:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 696 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358585</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the CIT&#039;s invocation of Section 263 was not justified as it did not cause prejudice to the Revenue. The matter was restored to the CIT(A) for reconsideration of the proviso to Section 2(15) and the exemption under Section 11. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>