https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200696 Multiple petitioners challenging the same taxing provision in a common writ petition remained liable for separate court-fees because each carried on an independent liquor vending business and had a distinct cause of action. The writ rules allowed joinder on a deemed common-interest basis, but that procedural did not override the Court-fees Act. Applying Section 6(3) of the Karnataka Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, read with Section 6(4), the petition had to bear the aggregate fee that would have been payable if separate petitions were filed. The objection to deficit court-fee was therefore correctly upheld. en-us Wed, 04 Nov 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Apr 2018 07:15:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200696 Multiple petitioners challenging the same taxing provision in a common writ petition remained liable for separate court-fees because each carried on an independent liquor vending business and had a distinct cause of action. The writ rules allowed joinder on a deemed common-interest basis, but that procedural did not override the Court-fees Act. Applying Section 6(3) of the Karnataka Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, read with Section 6(4), the petition had to bear the aggregate fee that would have been payable if separate petitions were filed. The objection to deficit court-fee was therefore correctly upheld. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 04 Nov 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200696