<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1302 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200702</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging revocation of a customs broker licence and allied penalties was found not maintainable where the dispute depended on factual issues about reimbursement timing and the nature of the payment said to have been made. Those controversies were considered unsuitable for writ adjudication, especially since an efficacious statutory appellate remedy was available under the Customs Act. The Court therefore declined to examine the merits of the revocation order and left the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2018 07:15:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1302 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200702</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging revocation of a customs broker licence and allied penalties was found not maintainable where the dispute depended on factual issues about reimbursement timing and the nature of the payment said to have been made. Those controversies were considered unsuitable for writ adjudication, especially since an efficacious statutory appellate remedy was available under the Customs Act. The Court therefore declined to examine the merits of the revocation order and left the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>