<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Commercial Training Center Denied Tax Exemption as Certificates Issued by Board, Not Appellant; Exemption Law Clarified.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38877</link>
    <description>Commercial Training and Coaching Center - case of Revenue is that the certificate of marks is issued by the Board of Intermediate Education (BIE) and not by appellant; as appellants are not issuing any certificates to the students and cannot claim exempt - It is settled law that if the plain meaning of the exemption notification covers the assessee, the benefit should be allowed - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2018 07:14:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2018 07:14:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Commercial Training Center Denied Tax Exemption as Certificates Issued by Board, Not Appellant; Exemption Law Clarified.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38877</link>
      <description>Commercial Training and Coaching Center - case of Revenue is that the certificate of marks is issued by the Board of Intermediate Education (BIE) and not by appellant; as appellants are not issuing any certificates to the students and cannot claim exempt - It is settled law that if the plain meaning of the exemption notification covers the assessee, the benefit should be allowed - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2018 07:14:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>