https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358567 An umpire acting after arbitrators disagreed was held to enter the reference in place of the arbitrators and need not restart the arbitration de novo merely because the matter came before him; a rehearing of evidence or witnesses had to be sought promptly and could be waived by delayed conduct. The challenge to the award also failed because courts will not reappraise evidence or disturb arbitral findings absent manifest error or jurisdictional infirmity. On both issues, the award was sustained and the appeal failed in entirety. en-us Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Apr 2018 09:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358567 An umpire acting after arbitrators disagreed was held to enter the reference in place of the arbitrators and need not restart the arbitration de novo merely because the matter came before him; a rehearing of evidence or witnesses had to be sought promptly and could be waived by delayed conduct. The challenge to the award also failed because courts will not reappraise evidence or disturb arbitral findings absent manifest error or jurisdictional infirmity. On both issues, the award was sustained and the appeal failed in entirety. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358567