<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 660 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358549</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, remanding the matter to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision considering the Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. judgment. The Tribunal found prima facie admissibility for credit related to transport to depot and export goods post-1.4.2008, with credit available for sales pre-1.4.2008 post that date. Lack of document verification led to the remand for a new order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2018 07:13:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 660 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358549</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, remanding the matter to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision considering the Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. judgment. The Tribunal found prima facie admissibility for credit related to transport to depot and export goods post-1.4.2008, with credit available for sales pre-1.4.2008 post that date. Lack of document verification led to the remand for a new order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>