<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 648 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358537</link>
    <description>Concurrent factual findings based on slips recovered from a partner&#039;s residence were sustained where the department failed to establish a nexus between those documents and the assessee&#039;s regular electrical goods business. The records referred to gold and silver transactions, and there was no material to show that the assessee dealt in jewellery, so the turnover addition was not interfered with. On the same footing, the penalty under Section 16(2) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 was upheld, as no perversity, illegality, or substantial question of law arose from the evidence-based findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2018 07:13:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 648 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358537</link>
      <description>Concurrent factual findings based on slips recovered from a partner&#039;s residence were sustained where the department failed to establish a nexus between those documents and the assessee&#039;s regular electrical goods business. The records referred to gold and silver transactions, and there was no material to show that the assessee dealt in jewellery, so the turnover addition was not interfered with. On the same footing, the penalty under Section 16(2) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 was upheld, as no perversity, illegality, or substantial question of law arose from the evidence-based findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>