https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200693 A lawful benami arrangement binds the real owner through proceedings against the benamidar, and the beneficial owner is not an indispensable party where no adverse title is asserted; the benamidar's claim therefore should not have been dismissed. A reversioner's challenge to the Amhara village sale was not barred by estoppel, because Hanuman Sahay's joinder in the conveyance, without proof of reliance and change of position by the purchaser, created no estoppel and no basis for feeding the estoppel through his later purchase. The sales in suit No. 101 were upheld only to the extent supported by legal necessity, with the decree modified to reflect the proper shares and conditional relief. en-us Thu, 17 Oct 1918 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Apr 2018 17:09:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200693 A lawful benami arrangement binds the real owner through proceedings against the benamidar, and the beneficial owner is not an indispensable party where no adverse title is asserted; the benamidar's claim therefore should not have been dismissed. A reversioner's challenge to the Amhara village sale was not barred by estoppel, because Hanuman Sahay's joinder in the conveyance, without proof of reliance and change of position by the purchaser, created no estoppel and no basis for feeding the estoppel through his later purchase. The sales in suit No. 101 were upheld only to the extent supported by legal necessity, with the decree modified to reflect the proper shares and conditional relief. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 Oct 1918 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200693