<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 643 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358532</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the appellant, directing a fresh assessment by the Assessing Officer. The denial of exemption under section 11 was challenged successfully, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s charitable nature and activities conducted without a profit motive. The inclusion of various receipts as income was contested and found to be of a capital nature, not subject to tax. The Tribunal disagreed with the revenue&#039;s arguments and directed a reconsideration based on the nature of the receipts. The lower authorities were found to have incorrectly applied provisions, leading to the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the appellant for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 08:18:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 643 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358532</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the appellant, directing a fresh assessment by the Assessing Officer. The denial of exemption under section 11 was challenged successfully, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s charitable nature and activities conducted without a profit motive. The inclusion of various receipts as income was contested and found to be of a capital nature, not subject to tax. The Tribunal disagreed with the revenue&#039;s arguments and directed a reconsideration based on the nature of the receipts. The lower authorities were found to have incorrectly applied provisions, leading to the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the appellant for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>