<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 36 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12671</link>
    <description>A short delay in filing the appeal before the Tribunal was capable of condonation where it was explained by the deaths of the officer handling income-tax matters and the authorised representative&#039;s mother, and the Tribunal had in any event examined the merits. Additional bonus paid under a lawful settlement was allowable as business expenditure because it was incurred to maintain industrial peace, avoid labour strife, and ensure uninterrupted production, giving it a direct nexus with business purposes and satisfying the test of expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively for business under section 37 of the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 10:48:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 36 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12671</link>
      <description>A short delay in filing the appeal before the Tribunal was capable of condonation where it was explained by the deaths of the officer handling income-tax matters and the authorised representative&#039;s mother, and the Tribunal had in any event examined the merits. Additional bonus paid under a lawful settlement was allowable as business expenditure because it was incurred to maintain industrial peace, avoid labour strife, and ensure uninterrupted production, giving it a direct nexus with business purposes and satisfying the test of expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively for business under section 37 of the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>