<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 630 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358519</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the case back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh examination to determine if the assessee&#039;s activities aligned with its stated objectives and if the income from various activities was part of or ancillary to its dominant activity of promoting micro and small enterprises. The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for statistical purposes, indicating the need for further scrutiny.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 08:17:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 630 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358519</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the case back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh examination to determine if the assessee&#039;s activities aligned with its stated objectives and if the income from various activities was part of or ancillary to its dominant activity of promoting micro and small enterprises. The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for statistical purposes, indicating the need for further scrutiny.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>