<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 43 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12670</link>
    <description>Chapter XX-C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 limits the appropriate authority to a single statutory choice on receipt of Form No. 37-I: either order pre-emptive purchase by the Central Government or, if no purchase order is made within time, issue a no objection certificate. The authority cannot treat the statement as non-maintainable or reject it on grounds outside that scheme. Possession delivered under an agreement conditional on tax authority approval does not amount to a transfer in part performance under section 53A, and therefore does not by itself violate the statutory regime. An alleged failure to file a rectified Form No. 37-I, without a sustainable defect basis, does not justify rejection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 10:44:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51681" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 43 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12670</link>
      <description>Chapter XX-C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 limits the appropriate authority to a single statutory choice on receipt of Form No. 37-I: either order pre-emptive purchase by the Central Government or, if no purchase order is made within time, issue a no objection certificate. The authority cannot treat the statement as non-maintainable or reject it on grounds outside that scheme. Possession delivered under an agreement conditional on tax authority approval does not amount to a transfer in part performance under section 53A, and therefore does not by itself violate the statutory regime. An alleged failure to file a rectified Form No. 37-I, without a sustainable defect basis, does not justify rejection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>