<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 624 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358513</link>
    <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty of Rs. 3,09,000/- imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act due to a defective notice that did not specify the charge against the Assessee. Relying on judicial precedents, the Tribunal followed the principle favoring the Assessee and allowed the appeal, citing the decision in Manjunatha Cotton and Ginning Factory. The order was pronounced on 28-03-2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 08:17:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 624 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358513</link>
      <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty of Rs. 3,09,000/- imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act due to a defective notice that did not specify the charge against the Assessee. Relying on judicial precedents, the Tribunal followed the principle favoring the Assessee and allowed the appeal, citing the decision in Manjunatha Cotton and Ginning Factory. The order was pronounced on 28-03-2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>