https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358509 The court held that the amendments to The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, apply retrospectively, granting jurisdiction to the court where the payee's bank is situated. The delay in filing the restoration application was excused, and the complaint was restored to its original stage and number for proceedings in the South East District, Saket. The court instructed the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate to implement the order via the District and Sessions Judge, South East District. en-us Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Apr 2018 15:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358509 The court held that the amendments to The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, apply retrospectively, granting jurisdiction to the court where the payee's bank is situated. The delay in filing the restoration application was excused, and the complaint was restored to its original stage and number for proceedings in the South East District, Saket. The court instructed the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate to implement the order via the District and Sessions Judge, South East District. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358509