https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12669 The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal's orders and directing reassessment of the return, specifically focusing on the addition of Rs. 6,26,668 due to under-invoicing. The Court emphasized the importance of thorough verification of seized documents, avoiding generalizations in making additions, and addressing fraudulent practices like under-invoicing during income tax assessments. en-us Tue, 04 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 May 2009 10:42:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12669 The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal's orders and directing reassessment of the return, specifically focusing on the addition of Rs. 6,26,668 due to under-invoicing. The Court emphasized the importance of thorough verification of seized documents, avoiding generalizations in making additions, and addressing fraudulent practices like under-invoicing during income tax assessments. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 04 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12669