<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 619 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358508</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the demand under Works Contract Service, upheld the uncontested demand of Rs. 9,11,262, and remanded the service classification issue for transportation for further review. The judgment emphasized adherence to the scope of show cause notices and proper classification of services based on evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 07:32:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 619 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358508</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the demand under Works Contract Service, upheld the uncontested demand of Rs. 9,11,262, and remanded the service classification issue for transportation for further review. The judgment emphasized adherence to the scope of show cause notices and proper classification of services based on evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>