<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 34 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12668</link>
    <description>Section 45(4) applies only where capital assets are actually transferred by way of distribution on dissolution of a firm. Dissolution by operation of law, without any corresponding transfer of the firm&#039;s assets, is not enough to trigger capital gains tax because dissolution and transfer are distinct events. As no transfer occurred in the relevant year, no capital gains arose and the reference was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 22:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 34 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12668</link>
      <description>Section 45(4) applies only where capital assets are actually transferred by way of distribution on dissolution of a firm. Dissolution by operation of law, without any corresponding transfer of the firm&#039;s assets, is not enough to trigger capital gains tax because dissolution and transfer are distinct events. As no transfer occurred in the relevant year, no capital gains arose and the reference was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>