<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 609 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358498</link>
    <description>The court directed the impugned communication denying a stay of tax demand to be kept in abeyance for four weeks, instructing the petitioner to file a stay petition before the first respondent within that time. The stay petition would be heard on merits and in accordance with the law within three weeks of filing. No costs were awarded, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 06:09:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 609 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358498</link>
      <description>The court directed the impugned communication denying a stay of tax demand to be kept in abeyance for four weeks, instructing the petitioner to file a stay petition before the first respondent within that time. The stay petition would be heard on merits and in accordance with the law within three weeks of filing. No costs were awarded, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>