<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 603 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358492</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found no evidence of malafide intention on the part of the Appellant in a case involving short deposit of service tax due to financial difficulties. As the tax was paid before the show cause notice and the Appellant was eligible for benefits under section 73(3), the penalty imposed under various sections was set aside. The appeal was allowed with consequential reliefs, if any. The judgment was delivered by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI on 22/03/2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 06:09:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 603 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358492</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found no evidence of malafide intention on the part of the Appellant in a case involving short deposit of service tax due to financial difficulties. As the tax was paid before the show cause notice and the Appellant was eligible for benefits under section 73(3), the penalty imposed under various sections was set aside. The appeal was allowed with consequential reliefs, if any. The judgment was delivered by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI on 22/03/2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>