<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 599 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358488</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Impugned Order and upholding the declared value of the imported PVC Flex Sheet Rolls. The decision emphasized the necessity of providing contemporaneous evidence for any enhancement of value and reiterated the burden of proof on the assessing authority to establish the transaction value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 06:09:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 599 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358488</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Impugned Order and upholding the declared value of the imported PVC Flex Sheet Rolls. The decision emphasized the necessity of providing contemporaneous evidence for any enhancement of value and reiterated the burden of proof on the assessing authority to establish the transaction value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>