<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 595 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358484</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and emphasizing the importance of proper justification and scrutiny in tax assessments and declaration rejections under statutory schemes. The appellant&#039;s declarations under the Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme were rejected based on tax dues admitted before other agencies, leading to differential tax and penalties. The Tribunal found errors in the computation of tax liability on renting property and stressed the need for adherence to statutory timelines and procedures for rejection of declarations. Additionally, reliance on statements by income tax authorities for determining taxable value was deemed insufficient without thorough examination and specific findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 06:09:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 595 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358484</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and emphasizing the importance of proper justification and scrutiny in tax assessments and declaration rejections under statutory schemes. The appellant&#039;s declarations under the Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme were rejected based on tax dues admitted before other agencies, leading to differential tax and penalties. The Tribunal found errors in the computation of tax liability on renting property and stressed the need for adherence to statutory timelines and procedures for rejection of declarations. Additionally, reliance on statements by income tax authorities for determining taxable value was deemed insufficient without thorough examination and specific findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>