https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12665 No prima facie case for contempt was found where the alleged non-payment of reward money was explained as payable only for appeals already disposed of, with the balance becoming due after finalisation of the pending appeals under the applicable rules. On that basis, the Delhi HC held that there was no clear violation of the earlier directions warranting contempt proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, and no notice under section 12 was justified. en-us Mon, 15 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 May 2009 18:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12665 No prima facie case for contempt was found where the alleged non-payment of reward money was explained as payable only for appeals already disposed of, with the balance becoming due after finalisation of the pending appeals under the applicable rules. On that basis, the Delhi HC held that there was no clear violation of the earlier directions warranting contempt proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, and no notice under section 12 was justified. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 15 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12665