<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 588 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358477</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed Cenvat credit for employees&#039; insurance but disallowed it for event management and insurance related to employees&#039; families. The penalty for availing Cenvat credit for medical insurance of employees was set aside as there was no malicious intent, leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 16:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 588 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358477</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed Cenvat credit for employees&#039; insurance but disallowed it for event management and insurance related to employees&#039; families. The penalty for availing Cenvat credit for medical insurance of employees was set aside as there was no malicious intent, leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>