<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 587 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358476</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appellant to claim Cenvat credit for maintenance of company vehicles, driver services, and gardening services as they were deemed essential for manufacturing activities. However, the credit for rent-a-cab service was disallowed as it was excluded from the definition of input service for the relevant period. The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the impugned order to permit credit for certain services while denying it for rent-a-cab services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2019 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 587 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358476</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appellant to claim Cenvat credit for maintenance of company vehicles, driver services, and gardening services as they were deemed essential for manufacturing activities. However, the credit for rent-a-cab service was disallowed as it was excluded from the definition of input service for the relevant period. The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the impugned order to permit credit for certain services while denying it for rent-a-cab services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>