<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 586 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358475</link>
    <description>A writ challenge to an assessment order was not entertained on merits because the dispute turned on contested factual questions concerning the nature of the activity, valuation of goods and the applicable rate of tax. The Court noted that the assessment had been made without adequate consideration of the written objections, but considered a remand unnecessary and directed the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. To balance hardship, the Court granted interim protection by treating the directed payment as compliance for admission of the appeal and staying recovery of the balance demand until the appeal was decided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 06:08:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 586 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358475</link>
      <description>A writ challenge to an assessment order was not entertained on merits because the dispute turned on contested factual questions concerning the nature of the activity, valuation of goods and the applicable rate of tax. The Court noted that the assessment had been made without adequate consideration of the written objections, but considered a remand unnecessary and directed the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. To balance hardship, the Court granted interim protection by treating the directed payment as compliance for admission of the appeal and staying recovery of the balance demand until the appeal was decided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>