<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (11) TMI 353 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200683</link>
    <description>Section 34(1)(c) of the Estate Duty Act permits aggregation of interests in Mitakshara Hindu undivided family property, including lineal descendants&#039; interests, to determine the applicable duty rate. Its constitutional validity is examined against Parliament&#039;s taxing power, the deletion of article 19(1)(f), and article 14&#039;s reasonable-classification standard. Fiscal legislation has wide latitude to classify persons or property, while the challenger bears a substantial burden to show arbitrariness. Aggregation for rate purposes is treated as a recognised fiscal mechanism where the classification rests on an intelligible differentia rationally connected to the Estate Duty Act&#039;s object.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 18:54:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (11) TMI 353 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200683</link>
      <description>Section 34(1)(c) of the Estate Duty Act permits aggregation of interests in Mitakshara Hindu undivided family property, including lineal descendants&#039; interests, to determine the applicable duty rate. Its constitutional validity is examined against Parliament&#039;s taxing power, the deletion of article 19(1)(f), and article 14&#039;s reasonable-classification standard. Fiscal legislation has wide latitude to classify persons or property, while the challenger bears a substantial burden to show arbitrariness. Aggregation for rate purposes is treated as a recognised fiscal mechanism where the classification rests on an intelligible differentia rationally connected to the Estate Duty Act&#039;s object.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>