<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 579 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358468</link>
    <description>Goods detained for alleged transport without requisite documents were directed to be dealt with through expeditious adjudication under Section 129 of the CGST Act and the Kerala SGST Act. The petitioner said the documents were later furnished, while the department maintained that they were unrelated to the goods in transit. On these rival claims, the Court did not order immediate release of the goods and instead required the statutory adjudication process to be completed promptly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 17:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 579 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358468</link>
      <description>Goods detained for alleged transport without requisite documents were directed to be dealt with through expeditious adjudication under Section 129 of the CGST Act and the Kerala SGST Act. The petitioner said the documents were later furnished, while the department maintained that they were unrelated to the goods in transit. On these rival claims, the Court did not order immediate release of the goods and instead required the statutory adjudication process to be completed promptly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>