<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 577 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358466</link>
    <description>The court granted interim protection to the petitioner, staying the notice issued under section 226(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petitioner was allowed to file an appeal with the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) regarding the disallowance of additional depreciation on certain assets. The court directed the petitioner to pay 20% of the disputed tax within a week as a condition for the stay. Failure to comply would nullify the benefits of the court order. The ITAT was instructed to consider the payment when deciding on any stay petition from the petitioner. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2018 16:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 577 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358466</link>
      <description>The court granted interim protection to the petitioner, staying the notice issued under section 226(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petitioner was allowed to file an appeal with the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) regarding the disallowance of additional depreciation on certain assets. The court directed the petitioner to pay 20% of the disputed tax within a week as a condition for the stay. Failure to comply would nullify the benefits of the court order. The ITAT was instructed to consider the payment when deciding on any stay petition from the petitioner. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>