<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 575 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358464</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision and CIT (A)&#039;s order regarding unexplained cash deposits and penalty under section 271D of the Income Tax Act. The Court found the gifts adequately explained, emphasizing the sufficiency of funds with the donor. The Court dismissed the appeals against the Department&#039;s claims, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 07:40:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 575 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358464</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision and CIT (A)&#039;s order regarding unexplained cash deposits and penalty under section 271D of the Income Tax Act. The Court found the gifts adequately explained, emphasizing the sufficiency of funds with the donor. The Court dismissed the appeals against the Department&#039;s claims, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>