<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 571 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358460</link>
    <description>The ITAT partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes. Various issues including disallowance under Rule 8D(2) of the I.T. Act, professional consultancy fees, treatment of share capital as unexplained cash credit, and deletion of disallowance under sections 14A and 68 were remitted back to the AO for further examination and verification in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 07:40:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 571 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358460</link>
      <description>The ITAT partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes. Various issues including disallowance under Rule 8D(2) of the I.T. Act, professional consultancy fees, treatment of share capital as unexplained cash credit, and deletion of disallowance under sections 14A and 68 were remitted back to the AO for further examination and verification in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>