https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12657 The court concluded that the dispute over the attachment order of premises involved contested facts beyond the scope of writ jurisdiction. Referring to relevant provisions, the court directed the petitioner to file a civil suit to establish property rights conclusively. Emphasizing the need for factual verification and legal process, the court granted time for the suit's initiation and instructed authorities to halt actions pending the suit. The decision highlighted the importance of resolving property disputes through proper legal channels, outlining the subsequent legal actions based on petitioner's compliance with the directive. en-us Wed, 28 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 May 2009 18:10:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12657 The court concluded that the dispute over the attachment order of premises involved contested facts beyond the scope of writ jurisdiction. Referring to relevant provisions, the court directed the petitioner to file a civil suit to establish property rights conclusively. Emphasizing the need for factual verification and legal process, the court granted time for the suit's initiation and instructed authorities to halt actions pending the suit. The decision highlighted the importance of resolving property disputes through proper legal channels, outlining the subsequent legal actions based on petitioner's compliance with the directive. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 28 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12657