<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 544 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358433</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that service tax liability should be determined based on the date of provision of services. Additionally, the Tribunal found that Cenvat credit should be available for input services such as accounting, auditing, and financing. The appellant successfully argued against the Department&#039;s contentions and the Tribunal set aside the earlier decision, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 544 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358433</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that service tax liability should be determined based on the date of provision of services. Additionally, the Tribunal found that Cenvat credit should be available for input services such as accounting, auditing, and financing. The appellant successfully argued against the Department&#039;s contentions and the Tribunal set aside the earlier decision, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>