<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 542 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358431</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the Appellants by setting aside the demands for service tax under the extended period and the imposed penalties, fees, and fines. The judgment emphasized the significance of the taxpayer&#039;s compliance history and intention in tax disputes, resulting in a favorable outcome for the Appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 18:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 542 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358431</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the Appellants by setting aside the demands for service tax under the extended period and the imposed penalties, fees, and fines. The judgment emphasized the significance of the taxpayer&#039;s compliance history and intention in tax disputes, resulting in a favorable outcome for the Appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>