<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 535 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358424</link>
    <description>The impugned order was set aside, and both appeals were allowed in favor of the appellants, providing consequential relief. The judgment highlighted the importance of concrete evidence and proper investigation to substantiate claims of clandestine activities or fraudulent practices, emphasizing the need for a fair and independent assessment in each case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 07:38:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 535 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358424</link>
      <description>The impugned order was set aside, and both appeals were allowed in favor of the appellants, providing consequential relief. The judgment highlighted the importance of concrete evidence and proper investigation to substantiate claims of clandestine activities or fraudulent practices, emphasizing the need for a fair and independent assessment in each case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>