https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200663 An amended proviso to Section 28(1) of the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 applied to an ejectment proceeding started after the amendment came into force. A landlord's ability to seek eviction under the statute was treated as a right to invoke a statutory remedy, not an accrued or vested right merely because earlier defaults had occurred. Because both the possession application and the tenancy termination notice were issued after the amendment, the revised requirement governed the proceeding. Compliance with intimation of each default within six months was therefore necessary for the landlord to succeed. en-us Thu, 16 Aug 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Apr 2018 18:28:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200663 An amended proviso to Section 28(1) of the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 applied to an ejectment proceeding started after the amendment came into force. A landlord's ability to seek eviction under the statute was treated as a right to invoke a statutory remedy, not an accrued or vested right merely because earlier defaults had occurred. Because both the possession application and the tenancy termination notice were issued after the amendment, the revised requirement governed the proceeding. Compliance with intimation of each default within six months was therefore necessary for the landlord to succeed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Aug 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200663