https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200662 A decree passed by a court in India was treated as enforceable in Goa once the Code of Civil Procedure was extended there, because the earlier inability to execute it was only a procedural impediment and not a vested right of the judgment debtor. The decree was not rendered a nullity merely because the suit had not been fully contested, and the appellate court had to apply the change in procedural law during the appeal. Article 261(3) was also read as supporting execution of decrees anywhere in India according to law. The decree was therefore executable in Goa. en-us Fri, 16 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Apr 2018 18:24:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200662 A decree passed by a court in India was treated as enforceable in Goa once the Code of Civil Procedure was extended there, because the earlier inability to execute it was only a procedural impediment and not a vested right of the judgment debtor. The decree was not rendered a nullity merely because the suit had not been fully contested, and the appellate court had to apply the change in procedural law during the appeal. Article 261(3) was also read as supporting execution of decrees anywhere in India according to law. The decree was therefore executable in Goa. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200662