<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 26 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12653</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s petition seeking a reference of a legal question regarding the applicability of section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act was dismissed. The court found the assessee&#039;s cash payments to a sister concern fell within the exceptions of rule 6DD(j) due to exceptional circumstances and business exigencies. Emphasizing the genuineness of transactions and parties, the court rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, noting the Assessing Officer&#039;s rejection based on the companies&#039; relationship was insufficient. The judgment highlighted the importance of considering business exigencies and convenience in such cases, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 18:02:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 26 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12653</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s petition seeking a reference of a legal question regarding the applicability of section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act was dismissed. The court found the assessee&#039;s cash payments to a sister concern fell within the exceptions of rule 6DD(j) due to exceptional circumstances and business exigencies. Emphasizing the genuineness of transactions and parties, the court rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, noting the Assessing Officer&#039;s rejection based on the companies&#039; relationship was insufficient. The judgment highlighted the importance of considering business exigencies and convenience in such cases, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>