<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant Challenges Classification of Bins for CENVAT Credit; Discrepancies in Claims Require Clarification Under Heading 8474.90.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38829</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit - Bins - if according to the appellant, the item would fall under heading 8474.90, it was for the appellant to explain as to why it has not claimed cenvat credit for the same item supplied by M/s Hindustan Steel for whom it had earlier availed credit but later on reversed it when the Revenue brought it to the notice of the same. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 08:25:15 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 08:25:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant Challenges Classification of Bins for CENVAT Credit; Discrepancies in Claims Require Clarification Under Heading 8474.90.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38829</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit - Bins - if according to the appellant, the item would fall under heading 8474.90, it was for the appellant to explain as to why it has not claimed cenvat credit for the same item supplied by M/s Hindustan Steel for whom it had earlier availed credit but later on reversed it when the Revenue brought it to the notice of the same. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 08:25:15 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>