https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358420 In GST detention proceedings under section 129, the court confined itself to directing expeditious adjudication rather than examining the merits of the detention order. Relying on the earlier Division Bench approach, it noted that detained goods could be released pending adjudication in terms of Rule 140(1) of the Kerala GST Rules, 2017. The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to complete adjudication under the CGST and KGST enactments within two weeks. en-us Thu, 05 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Jun 2025 16:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358420 In GST detention proceedings under section 129, the court confined itself to directing expeditious adjudication rather than examining the merits of the detention order. Relying on the earlier Division Bench approach, it noted that detained goods could be released pending adjudication in terms of Rule 140(1) of the Kerala GST Rules, 2017. The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to complete adjudication under the CGST and KGST enactments within two weeks. Case-Laws GST Thu, 05 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358420