<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 501 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358390</link>
    <description>Where reliable internal comparables were available, export of trucks to associated enterprises was benchmarked transaction-wise under internal TNMM rather than by aggregating segments and applying external TNMM; the domestic segment was accepted as the proper benchmark. Import of raw materials/components from associated enterprises was treated as a separate transaction, and the matter was remitted for fresh arm&#039;s length price examination because the assessee had changed its stand and relied on additional evidence requiring verification. Any transfer pricing adjustment was confined to the international transactions actually under review, and entity-level adjustment was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 08:02:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 501 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358390</link>
      <description>Where reliable internal comparables were available, export of trucks to associated enterprises was benchmarked transaction-wise under internal TNMM rather than by aggregating segments and applying external TNMM; the domestic segment was accepted as the proper benchmark. Import of raw materials/components from associated enterprises was treated as a separate transaction, and the matter was remitted for fresh arm&#039;s length price examination because the assessee had changed its stand and relied on additional evidence requiring verification. Any transfer pricing adjustment was confined to the international transactions actually under review, and entity-level adjustment was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>