<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 495 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358384</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all counts. The sinking fund contributions were not considered rental income, the interest on borrowed capital was deemed deductible, and no addition for notional interest on deposits was warranted. The tribunal&#039;s decision was based on consistency with previous rulings and the lack of new evidence to warrant a different conclusion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 08:02:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 495 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358384</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all counts. The sinking fund contributions were not considered rental income, the interest on borrowed capital was deemed deductible, and no addition for notional interest on deposits was warranted. The tribunal&#039;s decision was based on consistency with previous rulings and the lack of new evidence to warrant a different conclusion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>