<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 490 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358379</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, emphasizing the initial Textile Committee report favored the assessee, and subsequent retesting lacked transparency and credibility. The Tribunal reiterated that in cases of doubt, the benefit should be extended to the assessee, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 17:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 490 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358379</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, emphasizing the initial Textile Committee report favored the assessee, and subsequent retesting lacked transparency and credibility. The Tribunal reiterated that in cases of doubt, the benefit should be extended to the assessee, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>