<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 487 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358376</link>
    <description>Once industrial plots were conveyed by registered sale deeds transferring absolute title, pre-conveyance allotment conditions that were not incorporated into the deeds could not be unilaterally revived or enforced by the transferor. The earlier stipulation to complete construction within two years ceased to operate against the purchasers after execution and full consideration, and there was no contractual or statutory basis to cancel the allotment on that ground. A further demand for 50% of the prevailing market value as a condition for additional time to construct likewise lacked legal footing, because any such monetary demand must rest on a valid enforceable basis attached to the transfer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 17:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 487 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358376</link>
      <description>Once industrial plots were conveyed by registered sale deeds transferring absolute title, pre-conveyance allotment conditions that were not incorporated into the deeds could not be unilaterally revived or enforced by the transferor. The earlier stipulation to complete construction within two years ceased to operate against the purchasers after execution and full consideration, and there was no contractual or statutory basis to cancel the allotment on that ground. A further demand for 50% of the prevailing market value as a condition for additional time to construct likewise lacked legal footing, because any such monetary demand must rest on a valid enforceable basis attached to the transfer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>