https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358374 False representation at the inception of a commercial transaction can disclose cheating, criminal breach of trust and forgery, so the dispute is not confined to civil remedies. The Court found that allegations of a false managerial status, dishonest inducement for supply, and misleading email conduct supported cognizable offences warranting investigation. Pending proceedings for cheque dishonour under the Negotiable Instruments Act did not bar registration of an FIR where independent IPC offences were also alleged. The writ and inherent challenges therefore failed, and the criminal investigation was allowed to continue. en-us Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Apr 2018 08:00:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358374 False representation at the inception of a commercial transaction can disclose cheating, criminal breach of trust and forgery, so the dispute is not confined to civil remedies. The Court found that allegations of a false managerial status, dishonest inducement for supply, and misleading email conduct supported cognizable offences warranting investigation. Pending proceedings for cheque dishonour under the Negotiable Instruments Act did not bar registration of an FIR where independent IPC offences were also alleged. The writ and inherent challenges therefore failed, and the criminal investigation was allowed to continue. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358374