<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 477 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358366</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the service tax demand for the normal period but set aside the demand for the period beyond the limitation, finding it unsustainable due to lack of invoking the proviso of Section 73(1) in the Show Cause Notice. The penalties imposed were also adjusted accordingly, clarifying the appellant&#039;s tax liabilities and penalties under the specific sections of the Finance Act mentioned in the Notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 08:00:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 477 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358366</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the service tax demand for the normal period but set aside the demand for the period beyond the limitation, finding it unsustainable due to lack of invoking the proviso of Section 73(1) in the Show Cause Notice. The penalties imposed were also adjusted accordingly, clarifying the appellant&#039;s tax liabilities and penalties under the specific sections of the Finance Act mentioned in the Notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>