<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 465 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358354</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI upheld the duty liability, interest, and penalty in the case, while setting aside the redemption fine. The Tribunal found the redemption fine inapplicable due to the absence of the offending goods and disagreed with the appellant&#039;s computation of interest liability. The appellant&#039;s plea to conclude proceedings based on the discharge of duty liability was rejected, leading to the continuation of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 465 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358354</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI upheld the duty liability, interest, and penalty in the case, while setting aside the redemption fine. The Tribunal found the redemption fine inapplicable due to the absence of the offending goods and disagreed with the appellant&#039;s computation of interest liability. The appellant&#039;s plea to conclude proceedings based on the discharge of duty liability was rejected, leading to the continuation of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>