<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 462 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358351</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, set aside the impugned orders, and remanded the matters to the respective Assessing Officers for a fresh assessment. The court emphasized the need for a central mechanism to address mismatch cases, ensuring a fair process for dealers. The Assessing Officer was directed to follow guidelines, provide a personal hearing, and complete the assessment within eight weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 07:59:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=516531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 462 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358351</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, set aside the impugned orders, and remanded the matters to the respective Assessing Officers for a fresh assessment. The court emphasized the need for a central mechanism to address mismatch cases, ensuring a fair process for dealers. The Assessing Officer was directed to follow guidelines, provide a personal hearing, and complete the assessment within eight weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>