https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200648 Transferred employees protected by an express assurance that their service conditions would not be adversely affected cannot be subjected to a lower retirement age by later Corporation regulations. The Government notification preserving existing service terms bound the Corporation, and directions issued under the Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950, had to be given effect. Subordinate regulations could not override that statutory protection or reduce the superannuation age from 60 years to 58 years to the employee's detriment. The employee was therefore entitled to retire at 60 years, and the attempted retirement at 58 years was unsustainable. en-us Tue, 23 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Apr 2018 16:05:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200648 Transferred employees protected by an express assurance that their service conditions would not be adversely affected cannot be subjected to a lower retirement age by later Corporation regulations. The Government notification preserving existing service terms bound the Corporation, and directions issued under the Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950, had to be given effect. Subordinate regulations could not override that statutory protection or reduce the superannuation age from 60 years to 58 years to the employee's detriment. The employee was therefore entitled to retire at 60 years, and the attempted retirement at 58 years was unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 23 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200648